Source & Citation Standards

Mainely Classic Design commits to publishing accurate and reliable information. Our content relies on verifiable sources and transparent citation practices. These standards outline our approach to research and sourcing, ensuring integrity across every article we present.

Authoritative Sources

We prioritize credible and well-established sources for all content. These include academic journals, official government reports, and historical archives specific to classic design and architecture. We also consult books from reputable publishers and articles from established industry publications. Identified expert interviews offer valuable direct insights to our topics.

Citation Format

Mainely Classic Design uses a clear and accessible citation format. For information found online, we provide direct in-text links to the source. When referencing print materials or academic papers, we use footnotes or endnotes as appropriate. This method allows readers to easily locate the original data and verify information.

Source Verification

Our editorial team thoroughly verifies all sources before inclusion. We cross-reference information with at least two additional reliable sources. Each author’s credentials and the publisher’s reputation are carefully assessed. This multi-step process helps ensure the accuracy of our published content.

Anonymous Sources Policy

Mainely Classic Design generally avoids the use of anonymous or unnamed sources. Such sources are considered only under exceptional circumstances. If anonymity is crucial for a source’s safety or professional standing, and the information is vital, it must be independently corroborated by multiple verifiable sources. Senior editorial staff must approve any use of unnamed sources.

Primary Over Secondary Sources

We strongly prefer primary sources to support our articles, especially when discussing classic design principles or historical facts. This includes original blueprints, historical photographs, archived documents, and direct interviews with craftsmen or historians. Secondary sources provide context, but they are always cross-referenced against primary data for accuracy.

Reader Verification of Sources

Readers can easily verify the sources cited in our articles. We embed direct links to online sources whenever possible. For other references, full citation details are provided. If you have questions about any specific source, please contact our editorial team directly at [email protected].

Handling Disputed Sources

If a reader disputes the accuracy or validity of a source, they should immediately contact [email protected]. Our team will review the claim promptly, typically within two business days. If an error is found, we will correct the article and note the correction transparently. Maintaining accuracy is our highest priority.

This page was last updated in March 2026.